| @Chrstian Marclay interview vol.2 |
|
|
@ @
Record without cover(1985) ![]() More encores(1989) |
S: By the way, how do you listen to music? by CD player? Have you got CDs?
M:
I listen to music on a CD player or a turn table or cassette, like everybody.
(laugh) I have a lot of records. I don't listen to them as much because
I think I've already become very lazy. With vinyl you always have to turn
records over, it's very short. When you put a CD on you can have half
an hour. I try to listen to my collection because those are the things
I like. Sometimes I'm conscious of my effort to pull away from the music
I listen to. I don't listen to so much music, I am not an obsessive music
consumer. I listen to music when I have times, now it is difficult. I
don't like to listen to music on a Walkman, when I walk on the street
it's too distracting. I don't need music all the time, actually. I don't
put music on when I'm doing something else, and I don't like listening
to the radio. The only time I listen to the radio is when I'm driving,
but I don't have a car so it's not very often.(laugh) S:
You first started as a performer with music but in the 80's you seemed
to be more into music. How were you going to be like that? Eventually
from the relationship with people? M: You mean why did I go for
performance with music?
|
|
S:
why or how.. M: any of those? (laugh) Well,
coming from the art world, my background was visual art and performance,
sort of the bridge between art and music, performance arts. But of course
the more I worked with musicians the more l became interesting in making
music for the sake of making music. Even if the thinking behind it might
sometimes be conceptual, the process of making music is very free and
very liberating. It's very different from making art in the studio, making
things like objects and installation takes time to realize. In performance
it happens, you just do it. There it is. The freedom was very liberating
for me. I didn't feel like I was doing something else, It was still, for
me, completely related to what I was doing with art. Because a lot of
my visual works are related to sounds anyway, to that relationship between
sound and image. M: It's really part of the same thinking process. The difference is in the physical results. Sometimes it's CD, sometimes it's a performance in front of an audience. Sometimes it's a collaboration with musicians. Sometimes maybe a soundtrack for a film. Sometimes it's installation, video, sculpture, but it's all under the same interest with sound and how sound affects our daily lives. We take sounds for granted a lot. We think images are more important. I found Tokyo is a very loud city, so many sounds, more than NY. Announcements, voices, subways melodies, a lot of voice recording, if you walk on the street, it's very lively. S: Do you actually record those sounds?
M: I don't have a recorder with me, I wish I had one, I don't know. Seems like a very loud environment, very rich sound.
S: What you think about it? Interesting? or really annoying?
M: Well, it is interesting, because there
is a cliche that the east is a very quiet and silent environment, (laugh)
but I don't know, this is the way we live now. City environments are getting
louder and louder. That's why people wear Walkman. It doesn't make a quieter
environment but at least it's a kind of filters to the other sounds. S:
Have you got any offers of work to remix albums? M: No. I think people are afraid I would destroy the music rather than make it more commercial. So I haven't have any offers, but why not! I love the idea, that's what I do.
S:
One more question is about your piece at Gallery Koyanagi. Before I saw
it I heard that it was a piece related to a real lynching. Which was a
very strong message. But it was very entertaining as well. I felt it's
a bit different in style from your former work, it was more quiet and
with more room for the audiences to see what it's for. What was your idea? M: Well, I think that piece is also very open. Unfortunately, very quickly people put a meaning to all the boxes and then it's full and that's the only meaning of the piece, but I think I see it as a piece about violence as much as it's a fun crazy piece. One gets a sort of a guilty pleasure from the excitement. So it really depends on how you see it. Because if someone's a guitar player, a rock'n roller breaks his guitar during his performance, one doesn't necessarily think "oh, he just destroyed the body!" because you can think of the guitar as a body as it has body parts, it's natural to say the body has a neck, a body, also a lot of guitar players give womens names to their guitars, and you can also talk about the metaphor of screaming, the guitar screams, so all these thinks change the way you might read this piece. Regardless, I'm destroying something, so it's always violence in a way. Especially as it's a valuable guitar, so all these meanings have reference to Nam June Paik, to western Cowboy rodeos, road movies, car culture, landscapes, all things there. Especially in the US, it's still very fresh in people's memory, it happened only two years ago. Where some African American got killed by two white men like this. They tied him up behind the truck and dragged him around. So it was a very violent racist act. But once you look at it that and read it as that, that image stays with you very strongly, then people could also accuse me of exploiting the situation, so I leave it up to people to interpret. If you see it as a killing, then that image would stay with you stronger than if I wrote a text about James Byrd, the man who got killed. But is it so different from my other works? I am not so sure. Because if you come to see my performance I destroy works very loudly, you know. Of course it's not so meditative as the pieces I did for the Tokyo Opera City. It also comes out of pop culture. The guitar, as a pop instrument maybe talking about an incident that took place in American culture. I mean, this is an event that took place in American culture. So it's not like dealing with completely different elements. Using records, or using record reviews, performance reviews with mixed review pieces with another text piece. Those are, for me, things that are really part of thinking about life, just everyday popular culture. But you know, using guitars to say something else, using records to say something else. (Interviewed March 28, Ginza) thank
to eyewill http://www.eyewill.co.jp/
Interviewed by Sanematsu Akira
http://www.netlaputa.ne.jp/~yangsane/ translator Sakaguchi Chiaki |
| ¨back |